L’OTAN veut maintenant nous faire croire que la Russie agite une menace d’armes chimiques !!!!
Cette bande de fous furieux nous rejoue la scène de la fiole d’Anthrax présentée par Colin Powell à la tribune de l’ONU en 2003 pour justifier d’une guerre en Irak. Il est bien regrettable que Macron ne se soit pas inspiré de la décision de Chirac de ne pas entrer dans le jeu des Américains à cette époque.

La menace de Vladimir Poutine de faire payer les énergies en roubles et non plus en US $ menace gravement ce dernier (*). L’Ukraine n’est qu’un prétexte pour empêcher la Russie de se développer et maintenir l’hégémonie du $ sur le monde. Ils se moquent éperdument du détail c’est-à-dire la souffrance humaine qui l’accompagne, tout comme ceux qui financent la migration sauvage pour déstabiliser les pays européens et qui n’ont aucune compassion pour ces pauvres gens auxquels on fait miroiter un avenir meilleur.
L’oligarchie financière anglo-saxonne est aux abois ! Tous les prétextes sont bons pour créer la confusion quitte à déclencher une guerre mondiale.
Doit-on, les laisser faire impunément ? Les présidents des pays adhérents à l’UE et l’Ukrainien ne sont que des marionnettes dont les ficelles sont tirées par le vieux cow-boy sénile lui-même aux ordres de ses maîtres, les adorateurs inconditionnels du dieu $.
Ça suffit !!! Aucun peuple ne veut la guerre !
Ne nous laissons pas manipuler par des irresponsables qui n’ont qu’une vision : augmenter leurs profits en se moquant complètement des vies humaines.
Nato warns of Russian chemical weapons threat
Nato leaders have redoubled warnings for Russia not to use chemical weapons or worse in Ukraine amid concern the damage could spill over into neighbouring countries.
« Any use by Russia of a chemical or biological weapon would be unacceptable and result in severe consequences, » Nato leaders said in a joint statement in Brussels on Thursday (24 March).
They also agreed to send chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear protective equipment to Ukraine and to share know-how on crisis management in case it was needed.
Allies’ concern was mounting because Russian propaganda has been laying the groundwork for a false-flag attack on Ukraine using internationally banned weapons, Nato secretary general Jens Stoltenberg said after Thursday’s meeting.
« Any use of chemical weapons will totally change the nature of the conflict, » he said.
« There’s also a risk that it will have a direct effect on people living in Nato countries, because we can see contamination, we can see the spread of chemical agents or biological weapons into our countries, » he added.
And Russia had a track record of chemical weapons use in the UK, Syria, and inside Russia itself, Stoltenberg noted.
Thursday’s emergency Nato summit was called one month after Russia invaded its neighbour and began pounding Ukrainian cities with conventional firepower to try to break resistance. It comes on the same day as EU leaders held a summit and the leaders of the G-7countries also gathered in Brussels in a show of unity.
The Nato meeting saw Ukrainian president Volodomyr Zelensky address Western leaders by video-link from Kyiv. Zelensky spoke « eloquently » and appealed for more Western arms supplies, a US official told press.
US president Joe Biden also spoke of Russia’s « brutal war » and promised Ukraine « significant, and increasing, amounts of security assistance to fight Russian aggression and uphold their right to self-defence » in a brief statement to media.
There were « very credible reports about the use of military force against civilians » Nato’s Stoltenberg said.
And Western allies would continue to supply anti-tank and anti-aircraft weapons and drones to Ukraine despite Russia’s aggressive rhetoric about outside interference Stoltenberg noted.
« [Russian president] Vladimir Putin has already crossed the red line into barbarism, » UK prime minister Boris Johnson also said.
Thin blue line
Despite the moral outrage, Western allies have categorically ruled out sending their soldiers into Ukraine in any role, such as peacekeepers, in order to avoid a Russia-Nato confrontation.
« We have a responsibility to ensure that this conflict does not become a full-fledged war between Nato and Russia, » Stoltenberg said on Thursday.
« We will not deploy troops on the ground in Ukraine because the only way to do that is to be prepared to engage in full conflict with Russian troops, » he said.
Nato already has 40,000 soldiers in four multinational battalions in the Baltic states and Poland in order to deter Russia from aggression against Nato territory.
The US also has some 100,000 soldiers stationed in Europe for the same reason.
The Allied measures designed to deter Russia also include warplanes on air-policing flights, anti-missile systems, and warships and submarines from the High North to the Mediterranean Sea, Stoltenberg said on Thursday.
And when Nato leaders meet again in Madrid in two months’ time, they will detail plans to send some 40,000 more troops to new Russia-deterrent battalions in Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania, and Slovakia in future.
« So this is long term, » Stoltenberg said. « We are prepared for the long haul because we can already say today that the Russian invasion, president Putin’s invasion of Ukraine has changed our security environment, » Stoltenberg said.
The war was the « gravest threat to Euro-Atlantic security in decades », the Nato leaders’ joint statement said.
Source : https://euobserver.com/world/154564?utm_source=euobs&utm_medium=email
(*) Quelle est la réalité entre le volume de monnaie fiduciaire en US $ circulant dans le monde et les réserves d’or effectives des Etats-Unis (Fort Knox) supposées être la garantie de sa puissance ? Sujet tabou !!!! Et pour cause.